Europe's Sustainable Workwear Brand
The Right Way to Manage ESD Risk
In many manufacturing environments, Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) control is treated as a compliance exercise. If the audit is passed, the assumption is that the risk is under control.
In reality, compliance does not equal protection.
Get Started NowAt Zaksberg, we work with customers who have already "passed" ESD audits — yet still experience unexplained failures, yield loss, or latent defects. The root cause is almost always the same:
Standards alone do not guarantee real-world protection
Standards such as IEC 61340 and EN 1149 are essential. They define minimum requirements and provide a framework for ESD programs. But standards alone do not guarantee real-world protection.
This approach may satisfy auditors — but ESD damage rarely announces itself during an audit.
An engineering discipline, not a paperwork exercise
True ESD control is an engineering discipline, not a paperwork exercise.
It means:
Control focuses on what actually happens on the production floor, not what looks acceptable on paper.
One of the most misunderstood elements of ESD programs
Without this, garments become a false sense of security.
ESD as a complete system, not a product category
At Zaksberg, we approach ESD as a complete system, not a product category.
This means we look at how:
"If it cannot be measured and verified, it cannot be trusted."
That is why effective ESD control requires:
The financial impact can be severe
Organizations that stop at compliance often face:
The financial impact of one ESD-related failure can exceed the cost of a properly designed ESD control program many times over.
A shift in mindset is required
Managing ESD risk the right way requires a shift in mindset:
At Zaksberg, we combine technically engineered ESD garments with expert technical advice to help you build a complete ESD control strategy.